Mark Cuban and Olympic Basketball

Today, Marc Cuban told Yahoo! That “…the Olympics are huge for-profit endeavor.  It makes no sense that NBA owners subsidize it.”  The article then goes on to detail the skepticism of other higher ups in the NBA.

Essentially, those involved in the business of basketball aren’t comfortable with their star players risking injury for no money in return.  For the players, it’s a golden marketing opportunity to get exposure internationally.  Cuban of course has a point, why should owners and GMs pay players tens of millions of dollars only to risk major injury playing for an event that won’t increase profit for the team?  The answer is there is no answer.

Proposing an age limit or preventing star players from participating is certainly not the solution.  Basketball is America’s sport through and through, they’ve only not won the gold in four Olympics.  It’s our way of asserting ourselves on the international scene.  Other teams can’t compete with America’s athleticism and intensity, and the country needs that.  It’s important to be reminded how powerful our nation can be, and it always seems like Olympic basketball is a sticking point of patriotism for viewers everywhere.  Simply put, it’s the most popular and important Olympic event for Americans, but letting these players participate is bad business, and you’re a fool is you think billionaires are going to allow a bad business decision simply for the pride of our country.  It’d be nice if they would, but that’s an idealistic way of thinking that has no foundation in reality.

So in the end, were no closer to a solution.  The push for a new system of Olympic basketball players will continue, as will opposition to it, hopefully the debate wages on until I’m long gone.  No matter how fiscally irresponsible it is to allow NBA players to represent their country in the Olympics without some sort of profit for the teams they come from, it’s an essential part of the games that can’t be lost…especially for America.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Cole Hamels and His New Deal

I remember when Matt Cain signed his mega-contract, I couldn’t believe it!  I thought in cumulative terms, and laughed that we’d gotten to the point in the business end of sports that Matt Cain was receiving the largest contract for a right-handed pitcher in baseball history.  It just felt like a stretch for a Cain, who seemed solid but not revelatory.  That kind of money should mean Cy Young contention every year.  In the end, it seems to have worked out.  Not only did Cain pitch a perfect game, but he’s 10-3 with a 2.74 ERA, and more importantly his consistency has kept the Giants pitching dangerous despite Tim Lincecum’s dreadful year.

So when Cole Hamels signed a deal that was the second biggest for a pitcher in history, the feelings I had about Cain’s deal resurfaced.  As good as Hamels has been, he’s only had one season with an ERA under 3.  Even during this season, where he’s been a lone bright spot for the struggling Phillies, he still has a 3.23 ERA.  Maybe Cain should’ve taught me a lesson, maybe I’m wrong in thinking that pitching is so cerebral, so fragile, that giving somebody $160 million dollars and expecting six years of dominance is a risky investment.

The Phillies are loaded up with huge contracts for Hamels, Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, Ryan Howard and Jonathan Papelbon.  They’re counting on production and development for years to come.  Is that unrealistic in a league where pitchers find serenity and balance one year, only to lose it the next?  Maybe or maybe not.  Matt Cain proved that developing pitchers can deserve the absurd paydays they’re now receiving, but Tim Lincecum demonstrated that sometimes, the slightest mental and physical lapses can change a career and leave a pitcher lost.  The Phillies are betting $160 million that Hamels will follow the former.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

The Red Sox, Injuries and Pitching

For a fan, nothing is more frustrating than you team’s fate being decided by injuries.  Regardless of the outcome, it’s impossible to settle with your team’s record if all of the pieces aren’t there.  It’s like those dreams where you try to run but move in slow motion, pure frustration.

So for Red Sox fans, it was an enormously annoying first half of the baseball season.  Our starting closer was out every game along with Carl CrawfordJacoby Ellsbury spent most of the year sidelined with injury as well.  These injuries, plus a couple more, have doomed the Red Sox to the impossibly close wild card race.

Seven teams are within 1.5 games of each other, but it’s more than battling other teams.  For the Sox, it comes down to battling their inner pitching demons.  Josh Beckett is 5-7 with a 4.44 ERA, and Jon Lester is 5-7 with a 4.17 ERA.  If those two can’t get their act together, Boston won’t be seeing the playoffs.  If they can, they’re as dangerous a team as you find in baseball.

For all the injuries and all the bad luck this year’s Sox have encountered, they find themselves in a position to make the playoffs.  The irony is that all the injuries aren’t what is going to prevent them from making a postseason run, it’s the dreadful pitching that will.  Sure, the return of Andrew Bailey would mean a consistent closer that the Sox so desperately need, but that closer isn’t going to mean much if their aces can’t get it together and manage to produce winning records.

After all of the offseason changes, this Red Sox team seems to be facing the same problems they did last year.  Their starting pitching is embarrassing, as is their bullpen, and unfortunately for us fans, there’s no way to blame it on injuries.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Kris Humphries Returns to the Nets

What an awesome tweet by Kris Humphries.  The Nets power forward signed with the Nets for an estimated $24 million over two years.  His offseason has been a rocky one, especially considering that his name was part of the supposed Dwight Howard trade, but Humphries, who is best (and unfairly) known for his 72-day marriage to Kim Kardashian, is finally where he wants to be.  So when the news broke, Humphries tweeted this:

Kris Humphries:  I’m up at Brooklyn!  @S_C_ “lucky I didn’t have Jay drop me from team” lol!

So damn awesome!  Humphries is referencing the lyrics by Kanye West, current boyfriend of Kim Kardashian.  On the track “cold,” West said, “Lucky I ain’t had Jay drop him from the team,” I couldn’t be happier Humphries fired back.

Kanye, like the rest of the world, has the foolish notion that Jay-Z, a minority owner of the Nets,  has the power to significantly influence the decisions of the Nets…laughable.  It’s not Jay-Z’s fault that pompous morons like Kanye use his name constantly in reference with the team.

Humphries, who averaged a double-double last year, has been the victim of hatred for simply being in a relationship with Kardashian.  Now Kanye’s in love with the big booty brunette, and he’ll tell anybody who will listen to his music.

Humphries is a solid basketball player who got in over his head with Kim Kardashian, we gotta let it go.  More importantly Humphries’ re-signing makes the Nets a significant contender in the Eastern Conference.  They should be a playoff team, and Humphries will be a significant part of that.

Meanwhile, maybe Kanye will watch him play, or maybe he won’t.  He might be busy with a fashion show that weekend, or busy ranting on twitter endlessly about his life.  Either way, it’s easy for me to see who’s the more annoying Kardashian accomplice, and it certainly isn’t the one who keeps quiet and helps his basketball team.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Cuban and Simmons Twitter Feud

Recently, Marc Cuban has been on a mission to prove the sports media wrong.  He went on First Take to give Skip Bayless a little lesson in basketball.  Bayless, of course, looked foolish and clueless about the sport he’s paid a ton to analyze and shout about.  It was refreshing to watch somebody hold the portion of the sports media that just speaks in hypotheticals and vague terms responsible for their opinions.  Then Cuban took to Twitter.  After Bill Simmons tweeted a criticism directed at the Mavs offseason moves, Cuban fired back.  It went as follows.

Bill Simmons (@sportsguy33):  Put it this way:  I wasn’t crazy about Elton Brand and Chris Kaman playing together in 2006 when they were still good.

Mark Cuban (@mcuban):  @sportsguy33.  They next smart personnel comment you mae will be your first.

Then, a third party tweeted at both of them, prompting another response from Cuban.

@Cmackchase:  @mcuban @sportsguy33 Well to be fair, Simmons also didn’t let an entire championship team minus the superstar walk away for nothing.

Mark Cuban (@mcuban):  @Cmackchase @sportsguy33 possibly because he has never had any involvement with a championship team.

After Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert randomly retweeted Cuban’s championship jab, Simmons responded.

Bill Simmons (@sportsguy33):  @mcuban I loved your Tyson Chandler trade, and I thought it was dumb when you let him leave.  There’s two.

Mark Cuban (@mcuban):  @sportsguy33.  Two what?  Is “thought it was dumb” your definitive logic for making personnel decisions?

Now, I’ve long been a fan of Cuban, if not for the simple fact that he’s a billionaire that went to Indiana.  When he schooled Bayless, I laughed at Skip getting called out for his useless insight that’s only purpose was to provoke audiences, but Cuban’s getting out of hand.

Those involved in sports have no right to criticize the sports media for not being a part of an actual team.  That’s not where their talents were best used, and for Cuban to arrogantly look down at Simmons and question his basketball knowledge is preposterous.  He’s clearly on an angry rampage against the media and trying to expose their lack of substantial knowledge about the sports they cover…he’s wrong!

Simmons wrote an entire book on basketball and has proven time and time again he’s extremely well versed in the intricacies of the sport.  Cuban needs to get off his high horse and stop blaming the media when he can’t control his own team.  The Mavericks are a mess, and Simmons has the right to criticize them, whether or not the owner likes it.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter