Cole Hamels and His New Deal

I remember when Matt Cain signed his mega-contract, I couldn’t believe it!  I thought in cumulative terms, and laughed that we’d gotten to the point in the business end of sports that Matt Cain was receiving the largest contract for a right-handed pitcher in baseball history.  It just felt like a stretch for a Cain, who seemed solid but not revelatory.  That kind of money should mean Cy Young contention every year.  In the end, it seems to have worked out.  Not only did Cain pitch a perfect game, but he’s 10-3 with a 2.74 ERA, and more importantly his consistency has kept the Giants pitching dangerous despite Tim Lincecum’s dreadful year.

So when Cole Hamels signed a deal that was the second biggest for a pitcher in history, the feelings I had about Cain’s deal resurfaced.  As good as Hamels has been, he’s only had one season with an ERA under 3.  Even during this season, where he’s been a lone bright spot for the struggling Phillies, he still has a 3.23 ERA.  Maybe Cain should’ve taught me a lesson, maybe I’m wrong in thinking that pitching is so cerebral, so fragile, that giving somebody $160 million dollars and expecting six years of dominance is a risky investment.

The Phillies are loaded up with huge contracts for Hamels, Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, Ryan Howard and Jonathan Papelbon.  They’re counting on production and development for years to come.  Is that unrealistic in a league where pitchers find serenity and balance one year, only to lose it the next?  Maybe or maybe not.  Matt Cain proved that developing pitchers can deserve the absurd paydays they’re now receiving, but Tim Lincecum demonstrated that sometimes, the slightest mental and physical lapses can change a career and leave a pitcher lost.  The Phillies are betting $160 million that Hamels will follow the former.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Hamels Ode to the Old Ways

Bryce Harper has done nothing but excite.  Whether it is his outrageous arm or speed on the bases, Harper has demonstrated that the hype surrounding him isn’t a faux.  His energetic and edgy behavior has caused some controversy in a league where veterans reign in the team hierarchy.  So Cole Hamels, a lefty not known for aggressively going after batters, hit Harper in the Phillies-Nationals matchup.  Harper ended up stealing home in the same inning, but the odd turn happened after the game.  Hamels made a statement asserting that he did try to hit Harper, and that he was honoring the tough, old-fashioned style of baseball he grew up watching.  Hamels faces a five game suspension because of his foolish admission, this is one statement I will never understand.  Hamels intentionally hit Harper, and that’s fine, Harper knew it, the crowd knew it, and the umpires knew it.  You move on with the game, allow the message that you put forth linger, and play your next guy.  Making a public statement about your intentions isn’t only unnecessary, it’s asking for a suspension.  Nationals’ pitcher Jordan Zimmermann hit Hamels in the third inning, yet he faces no suspension.

The truth is, there are thousands of unwritten rules in baseball, most of them stupid and outdated, but if abiding by one saves you a five game suspension, why not follow it?  Why antagonize the media, the Nationals and the fans when you could’ve left your message impacted on Harper without discussing it.  Old-fashioned baseball is one of American’s relics, but Cole Hamels forgot the oldest tradition of all is keeping quiet about beaming someone intentionally.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter