Mark Cuban and Olympic Basketball

Today, Marc Cuban told Yahoo! That “…the Olympics are huge for-profit endeavor.  It makes no sense that NBA owners subsidize it.”  The article then goes on to detail the skepticism of other higher ups in the NBA.

Essentially, those involved in the business of basketball aren’t comfortable with their star players risking injury for no money in return.  For the players, it’s a golden marketing opportunity to get exposure internationally.  Cuban of course has a point, why should owners and GMs pay players tens of millions of dollars only to risk major injury playing for an event that won’t increase profit for the team?  The answer is there is no answer.

Proposing an age limit or preventing star players from participating is certainly not the solution.  Basketball is America’s sport through and through, they’ve only not won the gold in four Olympics.  It’s our way of asserting ourselves on the international scene.  Other teams can’t compete with America’s athleticism and intensity, and the country needs that.  It’s important to be reminded how powerful our nation can be, and it always seems like Olympic basketball is a sticking point of patriotism for viewers everywhere.  Simply put, it’s the most popular and important Olympic event for Americans, but letting these players participate is bad business, and you’re a fool is you think billionaires are going to allow a bad business decision simply for the pride of our country.  It’d be nice if they would, but that’s an idealistic way of thinking that has no foundation in reality.

So in the end, were no closer to a solution.  The push for a new system of Olympic basketball players will continue, as will opposition to it, hopefully the debate wages on until I’m long gone.  No matter how fiscally irresponsible it is to allow NBA players to represent their country in the Olympics without some sort of profit for the teams they come from, it’s an essential part of the games that can’t be lost…especially for America.

Cole Hamels and His New Deal

I remember when Matt Cain signed his mega-contract, I couldn’t believe it!  I thought in cumulative terms, and laughed that we’d gotten to the point in the business end of sports that Matt Cain was receiving the largest contract for a right-handed pitcher in baseball history.  It just felt like a stretch for a Cain, who seemed solid but not revelatory.  That kind of money should mean Cy Young contention every year.  In the end, it seems to have worked out.  Not only did Cain pitch a perfect game, but he’s 10-3 with a 2.74 ERA, and more importantly his consistency has kept the Giants pitching dangerous despite Tim Lincecum’s dreadful year.

So when Cole Hamels signed a deal that was the second biggest for a pitcher in history, the feelings I had about Cain’s deal resurfaced.  As good as Hamels has been, he’s only had one season with an ERA under 3.  Even during this season, where he’s been a lone bright spot for the struggling Phillies, he still has a 3.23 ERA.  Maybe Cain should’ve taught me a lesson, maybe I’m wrong in thinking that pitching is so cerebral, so fragile, that giving somebody $160 million dollars and expecting six years of dominance is a risky investment.

The Phillies are loaded up with huge contracts for Hamels, Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, Ryan Howard and Jonathan Papelbon.  They’re counting on production and development for years to come.  Is that unrealistic in a league where pitchers find serenity and balance one year, only to lose it the next?  Maybe or maybe not.  Matt Cain proved that developing pitchers can deserve the absurd paydays they’re now receiving, but Tim Lincecum demonstrated that sometimes, the slightest mental and physical lapses can change a career and leave a pitcher lost.  The Phillies are betting $160 million that Hamels will follow the former.

10 Best Players in 2012 Las Vegas NBA Summer League

The NBA Summer League just concluded in Las Vegas and a number of young studs, especially rookies, put on impressive performances. OneManFastBreak.net ranks the 10 best players in the Vegas summer league:

Josh Selby, Memphis
After what the former Kansas star did in Vegas you’ll understand why the Grizzlies let O.J. Mayo leave for free agency and sign with the Mavericks. Selby averaged 29 points and shot a mind-boggling 73 percent from beyond the 3-point arc (19-for-26). Overvall, he made 60 percent of his field goal attempts. His best game came against the Bobcats, in which he scored 32 points and made seven of 11 threes.

Damian Lillard, Portland
The Blazers got a good one in Lillard, who should step right into the starting point guard spot vacated by Raymond Felton, who signed with the Knicks. The Weber State standout averaged 26.5 points in Vegas and made 44 percent of his field goals. Aside from his outstanding perimeter game and naturally scoring ability, Lillard also unleashed a nasty side when he posterized Keith Benson on a rim-rattling dunk.

Klay Thompson, Golden State
Thompson absolutely lit up Cox Pavilion on opening night by swishing six of eight shots from behind the 3-point arc and finished with 24 points. With Thompson, Barnes, and Steph Curry, the Warriors will have plenty of firepower from the outside. Thompson, son of former Laker Mychal Thompson, shut it down early in Vegas but he still made a great impression.

Jeremy Lamb, Houston
The UConn Huskies are well represented in the Association and Lamb is the latest offering from Jim Calhoun. Lamb is a smooth player who has the total game — and has a little bit of T-Mac in him. The 6-foot-5 swingman has the pull-up jumper, the floater, and can finish at the rim. He also plays under control, which is rare for a first-year player.

Kawhi Leonard, San Antonio
Leonard had a short stint in the summer league (averaged 25 points in two games), but the Spurs had seen enough and there’s no reason for Leonard to prove himself. Head coach Gregg Popovich loves Leonard’s game and is already a major player in the Spurs’ starting lineup.

Bradley Beal, Washington
The former Florida Gater showed great poise and plays within himself. Beal doesn’t force things and is built like a running back. He should be a good complement to John Wall, who likes to attack the basket instead of stay out in the perimeter.

Terrence Ross, Toronto
Raptors coach Dwane Casey saw a lot of Ross when he played at the University of Washington and liked him enough to make him the Raptors’ first-round pick in the 2012 draft. Ross is a natural scorer with a boatload of confidence. He also had a spectacular reverse dunk in Vegas, letting everyone know he’s the real deal. Ross is Ricky Davis 2.0 without the off-the-court headaches.

Harrison Barnes, Golden State
The ex-Tar Heel scored 20 points and grabbed nine rebounds in a 66-57 win over Chicago Friday. He has proven he can create his own shot as well as knock down the long 3-pointer. Barnes should be the starting small forward for Golden State when the season begins.

Jared Sullinger, Boston
The former Ohio State All-American is using the disappointment on the draft as motivation. Sullinger is playing with a huge chip on his broad shoulders and taking it out on the competition. He may be undersized (listed at 6-9 but probably closer to 6-8) but Sullinger uses his body real well, especially on the boards. He has also displayed a decent face-up game, which is a prerequisite in Doc Rivers’ offense.

John Henson, Milwaukee
North Carolina is well represented in Vegas with Barnes, Henson, and Tyler Zeller all getting good reviews. Henson has surprised some with his low-post game. We all knew about his shot-blocking ability, but he opened some eyes with some jump hooks (with either hand) and an up-and-under move.

Brought to you by OneManFastbreak.net

Fantasy Baseball: Examining a Team for the Home Stretch

There are a lot of times throughout the year where the differences between real baseball and fantasy baseball show up. There are however no times when the differences are more transparent than right now, especially when comparing real baseball to roto leagues. Real contenders are trying to identify their strengths and weaknesses and exploring trade options based on that. Head-to-head teams are similar. But in the wonderful world of fantasy baseball roto leagues, things are a little different.

If a real team lacks a power bat, it makes sense that they’ll look to acquire the best available bat between now and July 31. If they need pitching, they’ll go for pitching. If they have a problem playing small ball, look for them to acquire a base stealer. In head-to-head, it’s similar. If a team is losing home runs every week, they’ll look to improve their power. But in roto, where points dominate, it’s not that simple.

To illustrate this, let’s take a look a fantasy baseball roto team of mine. To give you an idea, this team has spent the last few days fluctuating between first and second place. The third place team is not far behind and while the fourth place team is a good distance back, it’s one to keep a close eye on. In total, this is a 13-team, 7×7 league. But before we break down the points, let’s take a look at where I stand.

Hitting

Hits Runs HR RBI SB AVG OPB
Total (Points) 857 (12) 449 (13) 133 (13) 450 (13) 47 (3) .2866 (13) .3579 (12)
Team Ahead 877 N/A N/A N/A 48 N/A .3606
Team Below 839 448 116 438 46 .2871 .3556

Pitching

K Quality Starts Wins Saves Holds ERA WHIP
Total (Points) 752 (10) 72 (11) 58 (11) 58 (10) 24 (6) 3.923 (6) 1.271 (6)
Team Ahead 778 76 63 59 26 3.657 1.248
Team Below 726 65 49 55 16 4.084 1.296

When I first looked at my offense, my thought was to improve my stolen bases. But in reality, you have to look a little deeper. In a weird way, my low placement in steals is almost an advantage. If I hit rock bottom in steals, I only lose two points. More realistically, I have a pretty good lead on the last place guy, so I am only risking one point.

But why not try to bring in some high steals guys? After all, I can afford for some of the top teams to catch up in home runs and RBI. While I am at it, the hits race seems pretty secure. As Clave has pointed out, winning a category by one gives you the same amount of points that winning by 100 gives. So, why am I unwilling to bench some of my mashers for some steals guys? It’s not that simple.

When looking at potential roster moves, you have to determine not only how many points you can pick up in a category, but also what you risk if you don’t? More importantly, what do you risk if you do?

In the case of steals, guys who could help me in that category would probably not help me much in others. Even someone as strong as Michael Bourn is going to bring my team down in the power categories, while a Melky Cabrera type wouldn’t provide a big enough jolt. I would have to look for a Mike Trout type of player in a trade, and I am not willing to move what it would take to get him.

So, I would be looking at waiver wire steals guy who in most cases, they would probably hurt other stronghold categories.. So, I could catch the guy in front of me, but getting the next guy would mean eight more steals from there, with the one after that being another six ahead. Realistically, I could get up to five total points in steals, or two more.

Again, if I let it ride, the worst I do is lose two points. If I hold as is, I go a long way in securing the current totals in my strong areas, and could possibly pick up at least one point in steals. It’s a gamble worth taking, and it comes down to math.

Sure, I have a cushion in homers and RBI. But my best home run hitters and RBI men also lead my team in runs, average, and OPB, which are close categories. Going too hard for steals puts my points in those categories at risk. So, while I could pick up two points, if I fall from first to second in those categories, I could lose three. If I go beyond that, I lose four or more. In the end, the total points are all that matters. Balance is nice, but having eight points in two categories is no better than having 13 in one and three in another. Picking up a few points in one category only makes sense if you don’t lose them in another.

My pitching is a little simpler. In a nutshell, what I need to do is be very selective with who I start, bring in some holds guys, and maybe make a trade for a closer.

I could just stream like crazy for the counted stats, but that puts my current point totals in ERA and WHIP at risk. Again, picking up points in one category only matters if you at least hold them in other areas.

Good relief pitchers tend to keep ERA and WHIP totals down, while of course also picking up holds, saves, and even an occasional win. Now, I certainly can’t abandon starters, but I would be smart to stream less and avoid bad matchups for the rest of the season with my staple guys.

Now break my team down in the same way that I just did. I am sure that you’re looking at potential trades and waiver wire additions, which is fine. But don’t automatically look for the guys to bolster your weak categories. Dig a little deeper. If you’re in contention with low totals in those categories, you can continue to contend. It’s okay to look to improve, but don’t make a weak category average if it means making a good category average as well. Protecting the points you have is as important as finding points that you don’t.

Brought to you by TheBaseballPage.com

The Red Sox, Injuries and Pitching

For a fan, nothing is more frustrating than you team’s fate being decided by injuries.  Regardless of the outcome, it’s impossible to settle with your team’s record if all of the pieces aren’t there.  It’s like those dreams where you try to run but move in slow motion, pure frustration.

So for Red Sox fans, it was an enormously annoying first half of the baseball season.  Our starting closer was out every game along with Carl CrawfordJacoby Ellsbury spent most of the year sidelined with injury as well.  These injuries, plus a couple more, have doomed the Red Sox to the impossibly close wild card race.

Seven teams are within 1.5 games of each other, but it’s more than battling other teams.  For the Sox, it comes down to battling their inner pitching demons.  Josh Beckett is 5-7 with a 4.44 ERA, and Jon Lester is 5-7 with a 4.17 ERA.  If those two can’t get their act together, Boston won’t be seeing the playoffs.  If they can, they’re as dangerous a team as you find in baseball.

For all the injuries and all the bad luck this year’s Sox have encountered, they find themselves in a position to make the playoffs.  The irony is that all the injuries aren’t what is going to prevent them from making a postseason run, it’s the dreadful pitching that will.  Sure, the return of Andrew Bailey would mean a consistent closer that the Sox so desperately need, but that closer isn’t going to mean much if their aces can’t get it together and manage to produce winning records.

After all of the offseason changes, this Red Sox team seems to be facing the same problems they did last year.  Their starting pitching is embarrassing, as is their bullpen, and unfortunately for us fans, there’s no way to blame it on injuries.