Andrew Bogut-Monta Ellis Trade Aftermath

The trading of players is a common practice in the NBA and this year’s trade deadline kept the deals coming. However as common as trades are, equally as common are questionable trades. This year’s most debatable deadline move came in the form of Andrew Bogut and Stephen Jackson for high scoring guard Monta Ellis, Ekpe Udoh and Kwame Brown.

The first thing worth noting in this trade is the inclusion of Stephen Jackson, something which immediately raises questions about his inability to coexist with Golden State in his first stint with the team back in 2006 to 2010. Because of this, he was immediately moved to the Spurs for Richard Jefferson, a guy who hasn’t been a key player for years and is averaging a pedestrian 9.2 points per game this season. I don’t like this follow-up move for Golden State because it basically says you would trade Monta Ellis for Andrew Bogut in a one-for-one swap, and really, would you? I also don’t like giving up on Stephen Jackson, a player who, despite off court issues and track record, shows up to work every single day. He’s one of those hybrid players that can shoot the ball and drive to the rack aggressively because of his size and length; think of him as a very poor man’s Kevin Durant.

The positives I can see in this trade for Golden State is that for one they now potentially boast one of the most formidable front-courts in all of the NBA. David Lee’s dynamic ambidextrous play paired with Andrew Bogut’s ability to clog the lane and throw his body around should give the Warriors a big lift in the interior aspect of their team. The trade itself also indicates that Golden State saw Ellis as a hindrance in the development of rising star Stephen Curry. While Curry has played terrific basketball over the course of the last few seasons, his ability to stay healthy is a question mark and should not be overlooked as it is becoming a very real concern. A young player can only take so much damage without his skills being compromised, and having an elite scorer as a security blanket for Curry to not only play with, but learn from (Monta Ellis), could have been huge going forward. Curry will now be burdened with a lot more of the scoring load and may end up being the lone play-maker his team has, which will allow teams to focus on him. With Ellis on the court, Curry was dangerous as a wing shooter and as a play-maker, but without another slashing type of player Curry could struggle getting open looks. This will impact his value to his team as well as affecting his fantasy value going forward; pay very close attention to Curry’s stats in the upcoming few weeks as they will be very telling of the trade’s impact on him.

As I’ve talked about before in my previous blog posts, the lack of talented big men has made getting your hands on one a focus of every single General Manager in the NBA. Bogut is just that, very talented, but he does come with baggage. Bogut has shown in spurts that he can be the franchise Center team’s dream of, however he is another star plagued by the injury bug. Bogut is currently out for at least a few more weeks with a left ankle fracture and his return will be a gradual process. He hasn’t played in over 2 months and wasn’t exactly a dominant force when he did play this season.

Andrew Bogut to me seems to be the X-factor in this trade; Golden State traded their primary scoring option, and a top 10 scorer in the league, for an injured center that “could be” dominant at some point. I think Golden State panicked a little bit and got trigger happy when the thought of a physical force manning the paint came up. If anything, Monta Ellis was considered to be a prized asset at this year’s deadline, and letting him go in this type of trade does not reap the type of benefit the Warriors were entitled too. Had they received a valuable draft pick (or two) or another player of value I may see things differently, but that’s not how it panned out. The aftermath of this trade may be felt for years to come, and I hope Bogut returns and contributes for his new squad. If he doesn’t, this may well be one of the most regrettable trades the NBA has seen in quite a while.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

The San Antonio Spurs Stay Consistent

In sports, we develop strong opinions on people essentially based on the way they play.  I hate Chris Bosh but I love Patrick Willis.  I’ve never met either, but I would rather be shot with a nail gun than concede that Bosh is a cool player (though Chris Bosh has been a good fantasy basketball player this year).  Certain play is appealing to us on a weird, inherent level.  In the tradition of hating on technically-sound-but-boring-players, people sometimes foolishly make fun of Tim Duncan.  There’s a special place in hell for those of you who mock the Virgin Islands native.  Undoubtedly one of the greatest forwards to ever play, Duncan has quietly accrued numbers that are shockingly impressive.  He’s a 4-time NBA champion and 13-time NBA All-Star.  Even more impressive was that for 3 of those championships, he was the NBA Finals MVP.  Not to mention, a fantasy basketball workhorse for the ages.  But Duncan’s legacy is more than his statistics.  He is the San Antonio Spurs.  His career will surely end soon, and when it does basketball should weep for losing one of the humblest stars to grace the game.  But the odd thing is, the Spurs will be just fine.

When we hear Spurs, the first thought that comes to mind is fundamentals.  The truth is, we should think of front office domination.  They emulate the ideal franchise.  They’ve been consistent ever since they wisely drafted David Robinson with their first pick in the 1987 NBA Draft.  They caught a break, ironically, when Robinson got injured.  With “The Admiral” sidelined, the Spurs record put them in the lottery for the 1997 NBA Draft.  Even though the Celtics had the best odds of getting the number one pick, it ended up going to the Spurs, and they were able to select Tim Duncan.  They built their championship core within the confides of the draft, not big, rash free agent signings.  Even after those four titles they won over Duncan’s 13 years, the Spurs have positioned themselves beautifully.

Unlike a certain favorite team of mine in Boston, the Spurs understood that Duncan’s aging was inevitable.  They’ve built a consistent, young core that’s taken the torch from Duncan.  Enter Tony Parker and Manu Ginobli.  Parker is only 29, yet he and Manu both won three rings with Tim Duncan and the Spurs.  Both, by the way, were acquired through the draft.  They are now the veteran superstars on a team littered with youth.  The Spurs have managed to stay relevant not with their big names, but with the rest of the roster.  DeJuan Blair was selected by the Spurs in the second round, yet has shown potential for when Duncan eventually leaves, and the majority of the rebounds go to somebody else.  Rookie Kawhi Leonard has shown promise, as has 2nd year guard Gary Neal (both true fantasy sleepers this year).   Seemingly, the only player the Spurs added through free agency was Richard Jefferson, who has seemingly always fallen short of expectations.  Listing all these role players isn’t impressing anybody, and I’m sure the rest of the Spurs’ year will go unnoticed by fans looking for a thrill.  It’ll be the same tedious season for them as always.  And also as always, they’ll be around come playoff time.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter